TN: First Wines and Notes of 5766 | Jim Jones (in Tokyo) Email | 05-Oct-2005 07:53

FIRST WINES AND NOTES OF 5766 - Jonathan and Samantha's (10/4/2005)


Cathryn and I were fortunate enough to be invited (despite our Linnaean status as goyim anglicanus) to join our friends Jonathan and Samantha for their Rosh Hashanah dinner last night. Nice to see Jonathan and Samantha, as well as a few other folks -- old friends and new. Also nice to enjoy the benefits of Samantha's amazing cooking!

I brought wine, which was the least that I could do for several reasons. First, it's a gracious (and joyful) thing to do when one is so kindly invited to join a celebration. Even more important, on Friday night -- while Jonathan, Cathryn, and I were tasting wine at TAC, then enjoying sake and izakaya fare -- Samantha was rendering schmalz for the chopped liver. She deserved a little fun. She likes Champagne, so I brought a couple of bubbly things.


With chopped liver and pita with hummus, spinach dip, and green olive tapenade. And apples and honey, of course.


  • N.V. Monmarthe Champagne Coup de Coeur Extra Brut Premier Cru - France, Champagne, Montagne de Reims - Ludes, Champagne
    Nice tight agressive mousse with very small bead. Even with relatively short, broad Venetian flutes, the mousse had good persistence. Color was shaded a bit to the gold end of yellow-gold. Nose had a rich, ripe apple-fig character with a significant sweet leesey element. Lighter notes in the nose included a little toast and brulee. On the palate the wine was quite full and round, with the richness and roundness making the mousse just a pleasant textural prickle. Figs and apples carried through from the nose, along with a little butterscotch, hazelnut, and sweet cream. This cuvee is 50% chard and 50% pinot noir and spends 5 years in bottle before being disgorged. All of this shows very clearly in the wine's body and roundness. This wine had lower apparent acidity than most Champagne, but the bubbles on the front end and the austerity of the long dry finish kept it in balance. Very different Champagne but great with the hors d'oeuvres, especially the chopped liver.


With brisket, ginger-honey carrots, a great green bean dish, kugel, and challah.


  • 2000 Bois de Boursan Châteauneuf-du-Pape - France, Rhône, Southern Rhône, Châteauneuf-du-Pape
    Purplish color, just starting to take on lighter rust red elements. Dense but bright in the decanter. As soon as it is decanted, it shows a strong earth and garrigue character supporting dark cherry fruit. With time, a little meatiness and leather come out. The nose is clean and remains very much about earthy fruit throughout the night. On the palate, the tannins are nicely resolved, just barely nipping at the inside of my cheeks from time to time. The cherry and brambley berry fruit is surprisingly dry compared to the last time I tasted this wine. Fruit is enlivened by a little pepper and tarragon, as well as just enough acid to avoid flabbiness. This is absolutely ready to drink. Maybe it will improve a little, but in the last year the whole wine has moved so much from rich fruit and large body to a lighter, earthier, and drier character that I won't be waiting on the rest of my stash. As my friend Jonathan said -- "This just screams of earth and the south of France." And that's a good thing by me.


With a sweet carrot mousse and an apple-frangipane cake.


  • N.V. Aimery Sieur d'Arques Blanquette Méthode Ancestrale La Méthode Ancestrale - France, Languedoc Roussillon, Blanquette Méthode Ancestrale
    Rich honeyed yellow. Very clear for the type, but quite viscous. Mousse was restrained and almost seemed to vie with viscosity to make it to the top of the glass. Nose of baked apple custard and floral honey with a little spice as well. On palate, quite sweet -- sweet enough to stand up to a very sweet carrot pudding -- but well balanced by a nice dose of appley acid. Primary fruit of apple with a little lightly candied kumquat. Had an exotic stone and honey combination that was reminiscent of Vouvray moulleux, just with bubbles. Texture was evocative of fresh frothy sweet cream. Very low alcohol made this a nice way to finish up a weeknight celebration.


Great night of people and food. Also a good wine night. Nothing was corked; everything showed well, though the CNdP was a lot more advanced than I expected (and I know it had been stored well).


Posted from CellarTracker



    
How is the wine scene at TAC? | John F | 07-Oct-2005 03:03
I did a tour there the other day and was impressed. They clearly have a number of food and wine events. Also I noticed the wine for sale in restauruants seemed to be very well priced.

I then saw in a newsletter that they can sell wine and set up something like "Vinetard and Cellar"....can you buy wine from them directly (like a case at a time?)

Thanks

       
How is the wine scene at TAC? | Jim Jones (in Tokyo) Email | 07-Oct-2005 04:50
John:

First of all, TAC in general. I don't know if you've got a family with you in Tokyo. If you do (and if you can spare the coin or your company will pay initiation/dues), it is well worth joining. Good social outlet for family members, nice pool, some kid's activities, complete gym, etc.

I would say that the food is very good by club standards. Of course, by Tokyo standards in general, the food is not stellar, but they do a good enough job that we eat there a fair bit, especially in the kid-friendly informal restaurants.

As to wine scene...

There are one to two events a month. The themes are all over the map, but I would say they have a new world bent.

A few highlights are the Fall Vendors' Sale and the annual blind challenge. There is a current thread from me on this site reporting in the Fall Vendors' Sale. At the bottom of this note is my report on this year's blind challenge (typos and all!).

As to pricing... If you will send me an e-mail (via the button above when you read this post), tell me what your e-mail is and I will attach the club wine list (both in restaurants and for retail carry away). You can judge the prices and selection for yourself, which will be worth a lot more than opinions from me.

In any case, welcome to Japan!

Jim


AUSTRALIA V. FRANCE - Tokyo American Club (1/21/2005)


This is an annual event pitting one country's wines against another. This time it was Australia versus France. Five pairs of wines...varietally matched. Group voting determines the winner.


Welcome Wine


  • 1995 Laurent-Perrier Champagne Brut Millésimé - France, Champagne
    From Magnum

    Bright, light straw yellow. Restrained small mousse. Giving very little on nose...varietal chardonnay aroma, slight wite fruit, pretty unexpressive. Tight, light mouthfeel with acid more evident than mousse. More munier/noir on palate...apple, white plum, a little creaminess in texture. Somehow slightly cloying despite being dry.


Flight One -- Sauv Blanc/Sem


  • 2001 Cullen Wines Sémillon Sauvignon Blanc - Australia, Western Australia, Margaret River
    Light, light yellow...very bright...almost white at rim. Aggressive sauvignon character on nose...simple varietal aromas, with bright freshness and generic white fruit. With time, tart greenberry and floral come out on nose. Alcohol and white pepper very evident in finish (in the chimney).

    My WOTF.


  • 2003 Château Carbonnieux Blanc - France, Bordeaux, Graves, Pessac-Léognan
    Slightly deeper in color, but similar to previous. Much more restrained on nose (no greenberry/cat pee), but with a little smokiness. Rounder in mouth with relatively short finish. Flavor impact mostly in front of mouth and waxy. Oak is slightly intrusive, covering any fruit on nose.

    Group WOTF.


Flight Two -- Chardonnay


With crab terrine and pan-seared scallop


  • 2002 Domaine Leflaive Puligny-Montrachet - France, Burgundy, Côte de Beaune, Puligny-Montrachet
    Bright yellow...solid to rim...clearly viscous. On pouring, nose gives nothing. On first sip, oak immediately evident and dominating fruit. Amazingly long finish, though, that turns to malo/butter and apple. Good acid, full but not heavy body. Oak quickly recedes on palate to reveal the fruit. With a few mintes in glass, mineral and a little toast on nose, along with a tad of fruit trying to come through. A lot there, but tight and closed right now.

    Personal WOTF, WhWOTN.


  • 2001 Leeuwin Estate Chardonnay Art Series - Australia, Western Australia, Margaret River
    Slightly lighter than previous, with a little less viscosity and a little less brilliabce. Much more toast, butter on nose. Rounder, more giving with more tropical fruit character. With time, the oak steps up and starts to dominate the fruit. Maybe better with a few years for the oak to integrate????

    Group WOTF.


Flight Three -- Pinot


  • 2003 Paringa Estate Pinot Noir Reserve - Australia, Victoria, Mornington Peninsula
    Rich, red ink, young. Spicy fruit aroma -- major toasty oak (American??). Could be syrah if I didn't know better. Oak on palate with big rich red fruits -- plums and such. Good nose, good taste, but it ain't elegant -- a baby shiraz. After an hour, oak is ahead of the fruit.


  • 1996 Domaine Daniel Rion et Fils Chambolle-Musigny Les Charmes 1er Cru - France, Burgundy, Côte de Nuits, Chambolle-Musigny
    Slightly orangey but still relatively young. Just starting to show age. BURGUNDY NOSE -- sous-bois/animalle/leather. Definitely better right now on nose than palate. New oak oversteps the fruit, but good acidity comes through to make it lively -- with bright cherry fruit. Good while to go -- too much iak, but the fruit and acid hold it up. With time (1 hour) gaminess gone from nose -- relatively shut down -- but with great complex, exploding palate.

    Personal WOTF; Group WOTF


Flight Four -- Syrah


With lamb chops and mashed potatoes


  • 2000 Bernard Chave Hermitage - France, Rhône, Northern Rhône, Hermitage
    Deep, inky color, absolutely solid to rim. Mild hit of leatheriness (a la Coudelet) turning quickly to a little spice and pepper. Very much closed down I think...but clearly with a lot more to come. Palate is pper and slightly drying tannins and plum and berry. Tannins come out and shut down fruit with more time. This note doesn't read very well but this was really good. Rich fruit hiding behind the tannin and a nose that revolves among leather and a little game and the spice and primary fruit...getting stronger the longer it is open. As palate closes, nose opens. Wait 8-10 years or more...this will be amazing.

    Personal WOTF, WOTN.


  • 2002 Torbreck The Factor - Australia, South Australia, Barossa Valley
    Deeper, inkier. Absolutely dense looking. Lots of wood on nose, licorice, candied fruit. Very, very primary!! Viscous and sweet and jammy on palate. Chocolate in both feel and flavor. Lots of fun! With food??? Don't know. Way, way young. Rich berry fruit, tannin coming out on finish, but not in any aggressive way. Needs the tannin to cut through the rich sweet fruit.


Flight Five -- Cab, et. al.


  • 1999 Moss Wood Cabernet Sauvignon - Australia, Western Australia, Margaret River
    Young deep purple...solid...surprising reddish color at edge. Cedary, cassis nose. Immediately seems to be the Bordeaux -- nose settles down and becomes restrained after a little time. Fruit is sweet berry. Damn good wine and a tough competitor to its flight opponent.

    Group WOTF.


  • 1996 Château Ducru-Beaucaillou - France, Bordeaux, Médoc, St. Julien
    Young healthy purple -- no age showing. Nose incredibly closed at first...seems like water...with time some slightly dusty cassis comes out, along with the cigar box/ pencil/etc...With a little more time, a nice sweetness on the nose. On the palate, this one is clearly the French one. A little tannic and dry, but with the acid and cherry and breadth on the finish to be the winner.

    Personal WOTF.


As inconclusive as can be.

(1) Flight by flight, it was tied at 2 1/2 to 2 1/2 for the group.

(2) On total votes across all wines, Australia won it.

(3) The formal tiebreaker was the WOTN vote. The Chave was group WOTN, but -- interestingly enough -- only tied with the Torbreck within its flight. Go figure!

I was 5 for 5 in picking country of origin, but that was hardly an achievement as this was a pretty easy exercise. The wines were miles apart. Only tough one was the cab pairing -- and the finish made that pair clear.


Posted from CellarTracker



    
Bois de Boursan | O W Holmes, MIchigan, USA Email | 05-Oct-2005 16:26
Thanks for the notes. Like Jenise, my last Boursan 2000 was not yet mature, and even my '98 required a day of air to open up. Mine are the traditional, not the more modern Cevee Felix, and I am wondering if that might be the difference?

-OW
       
Wasn't the Felix... | Jim Jones (in Tokyo) Email | 06-Oct-2005 01:47
It was the basic level, more traditional one.

It definitely showed the terroir and character I expect out of a traditionally styled CNdP, but was just surprisingly open and had lost so much of its younger richness that I was surprised. Not necessarily a bad thing, but a surprise nonetheless.

Jim

          
Chalk it up... | O W Holmes, MIchigan, USA Email | 06-Oct-2005 14:22
...to my relative inexperience with the brand, I guess.
I agree that it was showing less fruit than when first purchased, but it only showed hints of those wonderful secondary flavors that some older CdPs develop, and seemed to me it was in that in-between stage when the fruit was fading but the tertiary flavors hadn't fully developed, so I thought "not yet mature - hold for 5" But as I say, I haven't had an older Bois de Boursan so I don't really know if it will ever develop, or just continue losing fruit with nothing to replace it.
At this point, I thought it was enjoyable, but not a wine to cause excitement, and I guess I will still take the gamble. Even if I lose, so what?
Unless, Jim, you or someone else on this board can tell me how this producer's wines go after they reach this point.
Where is Gary Kahle when you need him????

-OW
             
Chalk it up... | Jim Jones (in Tokyo) Email | 07-Oct-2005 02:49
OW --

My inexperience is the same as yours. I had no experience with this producer prior to the 2000 vintage. From tasting it up to about a year ago, I expected it to develop more slowly than the wine showed the other night.

Given Jenise's comments that her Olivets have shown bottle variation, with some developing faster than others, I'm going to give my remaining three Bois de Boursan bottles some time...say one in a year to 18 mos and see what has happened, then decide on the rest.

I don't think these are ready to head downhill or anything, just suprised by how fast the one came along and how open it was.

Jim

    
Fun notes | Jenise Email | 05-Oct-2005 16:09
I really love the ceremonial meals of the Jewish faith, it's been a privilege in the past to share some with friends. And, you did well with the wines. Btw, I have the Boursan you mentioned. My last bottle, about a month ago, wasn't as mature as what you describe here, so another bottle of yours has some chance of not being quite so advanced. I've had similar problems, if you can call it a problem, with my 2000 Olivets. All have been delicious, but some were surprising advanced. My last bottle, also about a month ago, was the seeming youngest of them all.



       
Fun notes | Jim Jones (in Tokyo) Email | 06-Oct-2005 01:45
Jenise:

I love Jewish festivals (and food) as well. It was a treat to be included in the Kriegel fête.

Thanks for the kind words on the notes and also for the comments on the Bois de Boursan. I enjoyed the wine, especially how terroir-driven it was, but I was not exactly pleased with how advanced it was. I'm just afraid that if they call come along this fast, we'll be missing some complexity and the fun of watching them develop.

I haven't tried one in about a year, so it is entirely possible that I'm experiencing the same bottle variation you have experienced with the Olivet. Mine are well stored, but it can still happen.

Jim

          
The Year 5766 | Steven Wolfe | 07-Oct-2005 02:21
Although it is the year 5766 in the Jewish calendar, it is only the year 3766 in the Chinese calendar - which means that for the first 2,000 years, Jews had to do without Chinese food.

             
Great line.... | Jim Jones (in Tokyo) Email | 07-Oct-2005 02:52
...especially apropos since the "Samantha" who was doing the cooking for us is, in fact, Chinese (at least by genes...though she grew up in Vancouver).

Jim

          
Storage | Jenise Email | 06-Oct-2005 16:13
The problem is when we store wines well, we are only preserving the wines as we received them. What happened to them before we got them is another matter entirely. It's always a mystery why wines purchased together and showing no other obvious flaws show signs of different aging curves, but in some ways the unpredictability is also the fun of wine, too. Of course, that's easier to say about our Boursans than our Latours, isn't it?

             
How true... | Jim Jones (in Tokyo) Email | 07-Oct-2005 02:54
I've always imagined that these strange variations within a case lot must have something to do with subtle cork differences. But I have no basis to know this is true.

Jim